Deciding to withdraw troops from Afghanistan that President Joe Biden was arousing a wave of skepticism of American global leads.

At the European Union (EU), Foreign Ministers of Member States held an urgent meeting of Afghanistan on August 17 and made rare criticisms aimed at Washington, suggesting that the US withdrawal

post

Photo: AP

This military action caused chaos, Latvian Defense Minister Artis Pabriks commented in an interview.

US President Joe Biden spoke about Afghan's situation at the White House on August 16.

In Germany, Armin Laschet, the applicant successor Prime Minister Angela Merkel of the Christian Democratic Union Party, called the decision to withdraw is NATO's biggest failure since its establishment.

In China, Foreign Minister Wang in the telephone with Dong Lai Antony Blinken said that the US military with the Afghanistan quickly caused serious negative impacts, and showed that the US could not apply

Speaking on August 16, protecting the decision to withdraw troops, President Joe Biden emphasized the United States needs to escape inexpensive pests in the age of competition between powers.

Our true strategic competitors, China and Russia, will not want nothing more than the US continues to invest billions of resources and attention into a stable effort of Afghanistan without an end.

However, the US government still faces difficult questions with decisions with withdrawal decisions, when President Biden has long transmitted the message that supporting human rights and allies to support foreign policy

The voices criticize Biden's policy now to ask what will happen to women and girls in Afghanistan when the Taliban gains control of the country.

What happened to the so-called 'American country returned?', Tobial Ellwood, Chairman of the British Parliament Council, questioned, referring to President Biden's promise on rebuilding

According to commentators John Hudson and Missy Ryan from Washington Post, the decision to withdraw the Biden administration troops raised a series of questions about the US position: Does it show a weak American and weaken the ability

post

Photo: AFP.

One of the fact that can be recognized in the past two decades is to promote human rights through military intervention as extremely difficult, Stephen Pomper, policy director in the international crisis group, African organization

Pomper led the US military intervention campaign and European allies into Libya in 2011. The campaign was implemented with the reason for protecting the Libyan civilians before the massacre of Muammar Gaddafi leader but finally

The Taliban representatives in the first press conference in Kabul on August 17.

On August 17, the world's powers began to accept the fact that the Taliban would power in Afghanistan when the leader of Abdul Ghani Baradar returned to the country for the first time after more than a decade.

At a press conference in Kabul, the Taliban leaders have broadcast the mediation message, promising not to discriminate against women or communication controls, and reassure that anyone ever collaborated with the government in advance

While the Biden administration is also considering whether to recognize the Taliban as a new government of Afghanistan or not, some countries have begun to give their own approach.

Russia, the country established relations with the Taliban long but unofficially recognized, on August 16 praised the group.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau while affirming his government does not intend to recognize the Taliban government.

The US Foreign Ministry spokesman Ned Price said Washington will only decide this issue after the Taliban shows goodwill to manage the country in a comprehensive way and prohibit terrorists who work on their territory.